Are Group Rights Justified? :: essays research papers fc

Are differentiating measures justified in the name of a group undecomposed or veilest or should they be condemned as violating the rights of individuals to equal treatment?It has been argued that differentiating measures that grant rights exclusively to groups are unjust as they trespass on the individuals fundamental right to equal treatment. This turn out seeks to prove that when applied in a fair manner group rights can enhance the equality of treatment received by the individual.The notion that equal treatment is of vital importance and that discrimination is immoral is widespread. The interpretation of equal treatment and discrimination however, is not . For some, equal treatment implies that each individual depart be treated in the exact manner all other individuals are treated. There should be no distinction made between race, sex, morality or language in order to allow individuals receive preferential treatment because of their membership of a certain group. Others arg ue that if each person is devoted exactly the same rights regardless of race, sex, religion or language then members of minorities are put at a disadvantage and equal treatment is impossible.In order to justify the entitlement of certain groups to exclusive rights it is important to define what the exclusive rights are. According to Baker these rights can be divided into two groups, those pertaining to intra-groups relations and those pertaining to inter group rights. The first type of rights involves relationships between group members and whitethorn lead to individual oppression. For example if a particular religious group were given the right to legally prohibit marriages of its members to non-members this would be unjust. Individual freedom, in such a case, would be subverted for the sake of solidarity. Intra groups rights can be very treacherous to individual rights peculiarly in theocratic and patriarchal cultures where there is a huge danger that women will be oppressed . H aving established that intra-groups are potentially subversive and wherefore undesirables the remainder of this essay will deal with inter group rights. Inter-group rights pertain to relationships between different groups. Inter-groups rights can, therefore, only exist in a pluralist state. Such preferential treatment seeks to protect a minority group against the larger society. The belief is that these rights will rule out the unfair advantage members of the majority group may have over members of the minority and will prevent marginilisation and segregation of the minority . These special rights can take various forms.